Recommended analysis by
sample category
Biotech Laboratories provides a vide spectrum of microbiological analyses. Listed below
are the major classifications. As we are expanding our range of testing frequently, if you
require an analysis that is not listed please contact the manager directly by
e-mail. The major sample types are listed
below.
To request a
quotation on what testing you want performed - click
here
General Water Sampling Procedures - click here
SAMPLE TYPES: Drinking Water, Cooling Tower Water, Recreational Water, Swimming Pools and
Spa Water, Reclaimed Water, Soil, Fuel, Dialysate fluid,
Air-conditioning Surfaces, Dust
and Air, Food, Food Processing Surface Hygiene, Food Processing Facility Audit
Note that CFU = Colony Forming Unit and means Organisms and mL
= millilitres.
Drinking Water
The testing for any specific pathogen in a drinking
water sample is not indicated in general situations, either because the laboratory methods
are unreliable, the organisms are in too low concentration to be detectable, or the
costing for such analyses is excessive. This methods of evaluating drinking water for the
likely presence of pathogens is best performed by testing for indicator bacteria of
contamination be that faecal or non-faecal in origin. Australian drinking water guidelines
recommend that plate count, total coliforms and faecal coliforms be performed, in addition
a faecal streptococci count and E. coli count may be useful. For chlorinated water
the plate count should be less than 100 CFU/mL for water that is not disinfected the plate
count should be less than 500 CFU/mL. Total and faecal coliforms, E.
coli and faecal
streptococci should be less than 1 CFU/100mL.
Packaged (Bottled) Water, Packaged
Ice and Mineral Water
The Australian Food Standards
Code requires that microbial quality packaged water and packaged ice
meets the following requirements; plate count <100 CFU/mL,
Coliforms <1 CFU/250mL and Pseudomonas aeruginosa <1
CFU/250mL. Mineral water must have Coliforms <1 CFU/250mL and Pseudomonas
aeruginosa <1 CFU/250mL.
Cooling Tower Water
The plate count of a cooling tower is recommended to be less
than 100,000 CFU/mL and a Legionella count to be less than 10 CFU/mL. These analyses
should be performed monthly.
See our article reviewing cooling tower
contamination of by Legionella
Recreational Water
Recreational water can be categorised into
primary (where head immersion is likely) and secondary (where only wading is performed).
The National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) recommends that
primary contact recreational water should have a median (of 5 samples
collected within a four week period) faecal coliform count not exceeding 150
CFU/mL and that secondary contact water should have a faecal coliform count not exceeding
1,000 CFU/mL for a random sample. However multiple sampling is recommended within a one
month period and acceptable results differ for these analyses.
Water used for
Washing Produce
The water used to wash fruit
and vegetable should meet the standards set by the Australian Drinking
Water Guidelines. Australian drinking water guidelines
recommend that plate count, total coliforms and faecal coliforms be
performed, For chlorinated water
the plate count should be less than 100 CFU/mL for water that is not disinfected the plate
count should be less than 500 CFU/mL. Total and faecal coliforms should be less than 1
CFU/100mL, although occasional results for total coliforms may be up
to 10 CFU/100mL. In regional and rural areas tank, dam, lake, stream
or bore water often has high plate count levels and may require some
form of disinfection, such as chlorination. It is important to
remember that water storage tanks must regularly be cleaned and
disinfected.

Swimming Pools and Spa Water
The NHMRC recommends for heated spa pools that
the plate count should be less than 100 CFU/mL and that a Pseudomonas aeruginosa
count be less than 1 CFU/100mL. Other authorities recommend a total coliform count, faecal
coliform count, coagulase positive staphylococci count and E. coli count of less
than 1 CFU/100mL. In some situations a Legionella count should also be performed
where the result should be less than 10 CFU/mL.
Reclaimed Water
The NHMRC and the Australian Water Resources
Council recommend that unless otherwise approved by appropriate authorities, treated
reclaimed water should have a faecal coliform count not exceeding 1,000 CFU/100mL. However
multiple sampling is recommended at half hourly intervals and acceptable results differ
for these analyses.
Soil
Whether to investigate soil contamination or
based on government requirements bacterial analyses for faecal coliforms and/or Escherichia
coli are often performed on environmental soil samples. Potting mixes can also be
analysed for the presence of Legionella.
Fuel
The fungus Cladosporium resinae and
other fungi can propagate in kerosine, diesel and aviation fuel; this can cause serious
engine damage. This analysis can be performed on fuel storage tanks to detect this and
other fungal elements.
Dialysate
The Australian Kidney Foundation and the
Australian and New Zealand Society of Nephrology Joint Subcommittee on Dialysis and
Transplantation. 1993, and The American National Standards for Haemodialysis systems
(RO-5-1992) state that water used for the preparation of dialysate should have a plate
count not exceeding 200 CFU/mL and that the dialysate plate count should not exceed 2,000
CFU/mL.
Air-conditioning surfaces, dust and
air
The examination of dust and air-conditioning
surfaces (including ducts) for a quantitative measurement of bacteria and fungi per gram
or per square centimetre, respectively, can be of assistance when investigating a
dysfunctional building or being proactive in air quality maintenance. Air samples for
microbiological analysis are based on either a filtered air sample (eg 20 litres) or an
equivalent sampling technique utilizing a centrifugal air sampler. Results are given as
organisms per cubic metre. Analyses include bacteria, yeast and moulds and
thermoactinomycetes. Identification of dominant bacteria and fungi can also be provided.

Food Quality
The microbial quality of food is constantly
under review by both the public and health authorities. All food processors (from
manufacturing firms to school tuck shops) are required to ensure that safe food is
supplied to customers. Bacterial food poisoning is the most common cause of food borne
illness. Generally more than 90% of the cases of food poisoning each year are caused by Salmonella,
Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium perfringens, Campylobacter, Listeria monocytogenes,
Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Bacillus cereus and pathogenic Escherichia coli. These
analyses and other organisms, both pathogenic and indicator organisms are routinely
performed by our laboratory. For specific information on food poisoning try one of these
sites: "The Bad Bug Book",
The Australian Food Safety Web and Bacterial Food Poisoning by Al
Wagner Jr., Texas Agricultural Extension Service.
Food Shelf Life
Evaluation
When evaluating the microbial quality of a food, to be held at a
controlled temperature, there are two variables to consider, the time
interval of performing the analyses and the organisms to be analysed.
It is recommended that as a minimum the food be evaluated at Day 0
(day of production), Day Max (day at which expected shelf life is
complete) and Day Max+50% (Day Max plus half the number of the
expected shelf life). For example, if a shelf life was set for 10
days, testing would be performed at Day 0, Day 10 and Day 15.
Obviously by increasing the number of samples taken on a day and
increasing the frequency of evaluation during the period more
information and greater accuracy of results will occur. The Day
Max+50% sample provides valuable data to the manufacturer that the
product will remain in good microbial quality if consumed (as often is
the case) after the "Use By", "Best By" or
"Expiry Date".
When evaluating shelf life there are three groups of organisms to
consider; indicator (such as plate count, yeast and moulds, coliforms,
Enterobacteriacae, faecal coliforms etc.), spoilage (such as
lactic acid bacteria, Brochothrix
thermosphacta,
Pseudomonas, yeast and moulds etc.) and food pathogens (Salmonella,
Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium perfringens, Campylobacter, Listeria monocytogenes,
Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Bacillus cereus and pathogenic Escherichia
coli etc.) In general, Day 0 to Day Max samples are only tested
for indicator and spoilage organisms and Day Max+50% samples are
tested for all three groups. The specific organisms selected from each
group will depend on the type of product under evaluation.
There is also a form of shelf life evaluation called
"Temperature Abuse Shelf Life Evaluation" where the product
is held at higher temperatures to mimic consumer abuse of storage
conditions. In this situation Day 0 and Day Max are only performed and
the analyses performed on Day Max includes all three groups of
organisms.

Food Processors
Surface Hygiene
A major component of the hygiene of a kitchen,
processing line or food production plant is the control of the cleaning of equipment,
storage tray, utensils and preparative benches. A simple inexpensive test provides a
quantitative test with has a sensitivity down to 0.4 CFU/square centimetre. The Australian
standard (AS 2997-1987) states that an acceptable limit to indicate satisfactory cleaning
operations by this method is less than 6 CFU/square centimetre.
Food Processors
Laboratory Audit
Many large food processors have in-house laboratories to perform some
or all of their quality control evaluations. When these laboratories
are not NATA accredited, an audit can yield useful information on the
quality of the facility, training requirements of staff, and areas in
which new technology could be used. Even though these laboratories may
not meet, or may be preparing to meet NATA requirements for testing, it is useful
to be aware of areas where simple changes can be made that will
improve the specificity, sensitivity and reproducibility of analyses.
Food Processors Facility Audit
Another service offered is the performance of
external audits of kitchen/food preparation facilities. Our experience in performing this
service for a national food outlet for all its stores in Queensland and the Northern
Territory has been well developed. The audit takes approximately one to three hours
depending on the customers requirements. The full audit evaluates the facility based on
food and surface microbiological sampling, temperature logging and area inspections
ensuring both hygiene and our customers standards are being maintained. |